Unraveling China Outrage Japan Fishy Release Sparks Controversy

Unraveling China Outrage Japan Fishy Release Sparks Controversy

26 Aug, 2023

China, the largest purchaser of Japanese fish, recently declared a ban on their imports, citing concerns about consumer health. However, experts argue that this justification lacks scientific basis, as the consensus among specialists is that the released water poses no threat to oceanic life or seafood consumption.

Contrary to claims, the primary reason behind this action seems to be geopolitical tensions. Henry Gao, an international trade law expert, noted that Japan's closer alignment with the US and South Korea plays a significant role in China's decision.

Remarkably, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) reported that tests on the released water revealed radiation levels significantly below Japan's set limits. This data is approximately seven times lower than the global drinking water standard, further supporting the safety of the release.

Although Japanese fishermen expressed concerns, analysts predict that the impact on Japan's fishing industry will be short-lived and less substantial than anticipated. The domestic market remains the primary consumer of Japan's catch, lessening the blow from China's ban. Top seafood companies Nissui and Maruha Nichiro share this sentiment.

Unlike China, no other nation has indicated a complete ban. South Korea maintains restrictions on seafood imports from Fukushima and nearby regions, showcasing a more measured approach.

Experts emphasize that even avid seafood consumers will be exposed to extremely low radiation doses—far below unsafe levels. Comparatively, humans can safely withstand significantly higher doses of radiation.

While Japan's fishing industry might suffer, the government's request for China to reconsider is grounded in science-based research. Prime Minister Fumio Kishida urged for expert discussions and diplomatic resolution.

China's decision has ripple effects, impacting Japan's seafood exports—particularly to mainland China and Hong Kong, which account for a substantial portion. Despite short-term disruptions, industry observers foresee exporters adapting to alternative markets, minimizing long-term repercussions.

 


Related News

China Asserts U.S. AI Chip Export Curbs Failed, Cites Nvidia

22 May, 2025

Nvidia, a leading AI chip manufacturer, has declared that U.S.…
Read More
China-CELAC Summit Unveils Cooperation Initiatives and $9B Credit Deal

20 May, 2025

The China-CELAC Summit recently concluded with the announcement of a…
Read More
Bain Capital to Sell China Data Centres Worth $4 Billion

09 May, 2025

Bain Capital is reportedly planning to sell its China-based data…
Read More
China Proposes Trade Deal to Strengthen Investment and Supply Chains

02 May, 2025

China has proposed a new regional trade agreement aimed at…
Read More
China Warns of Consequences if US Sets Trade Deal Terms

28 Apr, 2025

China’s response to President Trump’s statement on setting unilateral trade…
Read More
China’s March exports rose over 12% as businesses frontloaded shipments due to rising trade tensions

24 Apr, 2025

China’s exports saw a significant rise in March 2025, jumping…
Read More

© 2025 Business International News. All rights reserved | Powered by Cred Matters.