26 Aug, 2023
Contrary to claims, the primary reason behind this action seems to be geopolitical tensions. Henry Gao, an international trade law expert, noted that Japan's closer alignment with the US and South Korea plays a significant role in China's decision.
Remarkably, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) reported that tests on the released water revealed radiation levels significantly below Japan's set limits. This data is approximately seven times lower than the global drinking water standard, further supporting the safety of the release.
Although Japanese fishermen expressed concerns, analysts predict that the impact on Japan's fishing industry will be short-lived and less substantial than anticipated. The domestic market remains the primary consumer of Japan's catch, lessening the blow from China's ban. Top seafood companies Nissui and Maruha Nichiro share this sentiment.
Unlike China, no other nation has indicated a complete ban. South Korea maintains restrictions on seafood imports from Fukushima and nearby regions, showcasing a more measured approach.
Experts emphasize that even avid seafood consumers will be exposed to extremely low radiation doses—far below unsafe levels. Comparatively, humans can safely withstand significantly higher doses of radiation.
While Japan's fishing industry might suffer, the government's request for China to reconsider is grounded in science-based research. Prime Minister Fumio Kishida urged for expert discussions and diplomatic resolution.
China's decision has ripple effects, impacting Japan's seafood exports—particularly to mainland China and Hong Kong, which account for a substantial portion. Despite short-term disruptions, industry observers foresee exporters adapting to alternative markets, minimizing long-term repercussions.
20 Nov, 2024
18 Nov, 2024
14 Nov, 2024
12 Nov, 2024
11 Nov, 2024
07 Nov, 2024
© 2024 Business International News. All rights reserved | Powered by Cred Matters.